Skip to main content

Fighting Conservatism for centuries

Liberalism has been fighting the conservatism for the past 2 centuries at least. The civilization or the community which is liberated had undergone a heavy war against the conservatism. It is not easy to fight the age-old feudal structure, belief, inferior mentality of the people and very importantly those who suppressed the weak for their benefit.



Conservatism is a philosophy promoting traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization ie., basically the structure of the society in any civilization. Despite all discrimination that we have in society the conservatives support the feudal structure.

The Liberalism is a philosophy based on liberty, consent of the government and equality before the law. Here the society comes out of the traditional structure that discriminates people based on the community they belong to. The law and opportunities are common for everyone.

Getting liberated doesn't mean that we lose all our culture, tradition and our identity but we have all those in a very positive way. We have our culture and follow our tradition without any discrimination and all the masses have their opportunities.

Birth of Liberation

In the long history of mankind, humans were living in clans led by a leader. There were many systems to chose the leaders but evolution made this worse. The clans started owning lands and became territories and the clan itself divided into sections of society. The division of the sections was not equal. This is where the feudalism enslaved people. The humans never knew they were controlled, discriminated and enslaved. They trusted the monarch and nobles that they are saving them from poverty and failed to realise they were the rivals of their wealth and opportunities.

Then how did the liberation born?

Revolution

The liberation born out of the revolution. The humans are enslaved and never revolted against the monarch until they were fed. When poverty and famine strike the human he revolts and protests. This happened during the French Revolution, 1789 and the Russian Revolution, 1917. The revolution not only fed the people but also liberated them from all the traditional obstacles that obstructed their opportunities. The people know how hard it is to fight repression and getting liberated from the traditional feudal structure as they have undergone a revolution. So in countries like France, Russia the people are more liberated in terms of inequality in gender, class etc.

The United States of America has also undergone a revolution between 1765 and 1783 - The American Revolution.

The revolution in these countries brought many ideas like Republic, Democratic etc.

Liberalism and India

India has undergone a great freedom struggle between 1857 and 1947. The struggle taught us the importance of freedom and taught people to get out of slavery and monarch. So, we became a Republic. But the revolution we missed against the traditional feudal system is paying the people with discrimination and denial of opportunities till now. The people are very conservative and fond of following the traditional societal structure. That is not a problem but discrimination is.

Indian freedom fighters and leaders who worked for the nation made India the Democratic Republic without fearing its failure as the world criticized the move. But India is standing as the largest Democracy in the world for almost 75 years. We are very much liberated compared to many of the countries and societies but we have to get liberated more. We should not look back the countries those who consider traditional societal identities but should look forward to the countries developing by jumping beyond the traditional wall.

We could see conservatism everywhere in India, even in 2019 people are not ready to get liberated. People still opposing LGBTQ rights, women rights ( in case of Sabarimala ) etc. This is not to oppose the tradition or culture but just think beyond, women don't ask for something evil but to give their visit to the god. Indians could not tolerate the kingdom turning republic in the game of thrones series, people aren't against the portrayal of black people kaalakeyas as uncivilized in the movie Baahubali etc. Women harassment is increasing on the basis of caste.

We could see support for conservatism all over the world like the recent elections in the UK - the conservatives got a great victory, Trump led regime in the USA having conservative ideology resulting in trade protectionism, stopping funds to recover climatic change etc. But it is very dangerous for the common good. Conservatism could be good for a small country that has a single ethnic group or race. But for a country like India that has a huge diversity in religion, ethnicity, race etc. it is not good for the progress of the nation.


Comments

Popular Posts

சமூக நீதி - அரசியல் பிரதிநிதித்துவம்

சுயமரியாதை இயக்க பிரச்சாரமே சமூக மாற்றத்தை ஏற்படுத்த போதுமானது என்று பெரியார் நம்பிக்கொண்டிருந்தபோது ஆட்சி அதிகாரம் மூலமாகத்தான் சமூக மாற்றத்தை உண்டாக்க முடியும் என்று அண்ணா அரசியலில் இறங்கினார். சமூக மாற்றமே (social change) சமூக நீதியை (social equity/ justice) அடைய உதவும். நீதி கட்சி முதல் திராவிட கட்சிகள் வரையிலான சமூக நீதிக்கான பயணத்தில், கல்வி வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் இட ஒதுக்கீடு, வாழ்வாதார மேம்பாடு என பல திட்டங்கள் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு வெகுவாக சென்றடைந்தது. ஆனால் இவை ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கும் சென்றடைந்ததா, அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கை தரம் உயர்ந்ததா என்று பார்த்தால் பிற்படுத்தபட்ட மக்களுக்கு கிடைத்த நன்மைகள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டோருக்கு கடத்தப்படவில்லை என்பது தெளிவாக தெரியும். இதற்கு நிலவுடைமை, சமூக மூலதனம் (social capital, term introduced by CJI D Y Chandrachud) ஆகியவை முக்கிய காரணம். இதை பற்றி S நாராயன் IAS, வாஜ்பாய் ஆட்சியில் Finance  Secretary ஆக இருந்தவர் அவரின் புத்தகத்தில் (The Dravidian Years) குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார். இதன் மூலமாக கல்வி மற்றும் வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் கிடைக்கும் இட ஒதுக்கீடு மட்டும்

Protectionism

In a major setback for the Haryana government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Nov 17, 2023 struck down a state law mandating 75 per cent reservation for locals in private sector jobs, calling it "unconstitutional". While stating that private employers cannot be forced to employ persons from a particular state, the court, in its order, underlined that discriminating against individuals based on their state would be negative treatment against other citizens of the country. I have discussed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 in the perspective of problems due to protectionism in the article dated July 10, 2020. I have advocated that these kind of protectionist laws are irrational as it infringes fundamental rights of the citizens and rights and liberty of the corporates and private companies too. Im glad that the High court pronounced a judgement striking down the law as it is unconstitutional. Excerpts from Protectionism and Reverse migration, July

Liquor shops in India – Celebrated Glory or Shameful Dishonor?

Due to the nationwide lock-down from March 25, all the economic activities are shut down except for the essential services. Since liquor doesn’t come under essential needs liquor shops have also been closed. Though the pandemic situation is still in persistence, the government has allowed the shops to sell liquor. From then there are so many controversies and debates happening for and against the liquor ban. And the people are also agitating against the opening of liquor shops. So, here we will discuss, whether the country really needs a liquor ban or not, along with other associated aspects. Rights come first Though opening liquor shops during this severe pandemic situation is totally irrational and highly condemnable, I differ in the idea of a complete ban on liquor.  The state cannot interfere or coerce its ideologies to the citizens.  It is the right of people to choose their food or drink . People who don’t eat beef would raise voice to ban cow slaughter and who don’t drink would