Skip to main content

IMF's GDP Projections

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Wednesday lowered its growth forecast for the Indian economy in 2020 by 4.5 per cent, a "historic low", citing economic slowdown due to the two-month-long COVID-19-induced lockdown.



The fund, however, also said that India is expected to bounce back in 2021 with a 6 per cent growth rate. In 2019, India's growth rate was 4.2 per cent. 

The CoVID'19 lead economic crisis is different from other economic crisis in history and needs a different strategy. To revive the economy and boost growth govt should attract global investments and also increase liquidity and monetize the poor so much. Govt is highly ensuring the supply side hitch through credit guarantee schemes but only if the consumer has money in their hands these businesses would perform. 

Govt should not worry about the fiscal deficit and inflation for about 6 months. Only through more public spending, money would reach the poor - Garib Kalyan Rojgar is a good example. And regarding inflation, even if govt through MPC, controls the interest rates and inflation it will not stop hiking inflation due to demand for essential and food products. We could see a hike in WPI in May due to food prices. Also, it adversely affects growth. 

Adding to it govt increased the excise duty for fuels that also increases the food prices. Govt should ensure balance among inflation control, growth and food prices.

FM says the economy is recovering as the agriculture sector is contributing much. The fertilizer sales, wheat procurement by govt are contributing to the recovery and gives hope for growth in April - June quarter. But Agri sector contributes only 16% of the GDP, so it will not give high growth numbers for the quarter. Encouraging free market for the Agri products also seems good in terms of that the farmers have the choice to sell their goods but considering fuel prices and challenges in logistics, I believe they will end up selling it in the nearest mandi itself. I'm highly worried that farmers should not go to a situation of depending on MSP. 

High-level decision making are not always successful during implementation. There are a million examples from Mudra scheme to CGS. Please do research, make decisions based on statistical data and regarding structural reforms please consider parliamentary scrutiny and discussions instead of arbitrary actions.

Like our Facebook page:


Reference:

Comments

Popular Posts

சமூக நீதி - அரசியல் பிரதிநிதித்துவம்

சுயமரியாதை இயக்க பிரச்சாரமே சமூக மாற்றத்தை ஏற்படுத்த போதுமானது என்று பெரியார் நம்பிக்கொண்டிருந்தபோது ஆட்சி அதிகாரம் மூலமாகத்தான் சமூக மாற்றத்தை உண்டாக்க முடியும் என்று அண்ணா அரசியலில் இறங்கினார். சமூக மாற்றமே (social change) சமூக நீதியை (social equity/ justice) அடைய உதவும். நீதி கட்சி முதல் திராவிட கட்சிகள் வரையிலான சமூக நீதிக்கான பயணத்தில், கல்வி வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் இட ஒதுக்கீடு, வாழ்வாதார மேம்பாடு என பல திட்டங்கள் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு வெகுவாக சென்றடைந்தது. ஆனால் இவை ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கும் சென்றடைந்ததா, அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கை தரம் உயர்ந்ததா என்று பார்த்தால் பிற்படுத்தபட்ட மக்களுக்கு கிடைத்த நன்மைகள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டோருக்கு கடத்தப்படவில்லை என்பது தெளிவாக தெரியும். இதற்கு நிலவுடைமை, சமூக மூலதனம் (social capital, term introduced by CJI D Y Chandrachud) ஆகியவை முக்கிய காரணம். இதை பற்றி S நாராயன் IAS, வாஜ்பாய் ஆட்சியில் Finance  Secretary ஆக இருந்தவர் அவரின் புத்தகத்தில் (The Dravidian Years) குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார். இதன் மூலமாக கல்வி மற்றும் வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் கிடைக்கும் இட ஒதுக்கீடு மட்டும்

Protectionism

In a major setback for the Haryana government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Nov 17, 2023 struck down a state law mandating 75 per cent reservation for locals in private sector jobs, calling it "unconstitutional". While stating that private employers cannot be forced to employ persons from a particular state, the court, in its order, underlined that discriminating against individuals based on their state would be negative treatment against other citizens of the country. I have discussed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 in the perspective of problems due to protectionism in the article dated July 10, 2020. I have advocated that these kind of protectionist laws are irrational as it infringes fundamental rights of the citizens and rights and liberty of the corporates and private companies too. Im glad that the High court pronounced a judgement striking down the law as it is unconstitutional. Excerpts from Protectionism and Reverse migration, July

Liquor shops in India – Celebrated Glory or Shameful Dishonor?

Due to the nationwide lock-down from March 25, all the economic activities are shut down except for the essential services. Since liquor doesn’t come under essential needs liquor shops have also been closed. Though the pandemic situation is still in persistence, the government has allowed the shops to sell liquor. From then there are so many controversies and debates happening for and against the liquor ban. And the people are also agitating against the opening of liquor shops. So, here we will discuss, whether the country really needs a liquor ban or not, along with other associated aspects. Rights come first Though opening liquor shops during this severe pandemic situation is totally irrational and highly condemnable, I differ in the idea of a complete ban on liquor.  The state cannot interfere or coerce its ideologies to the citizens.  It is the right of people to choose their food or drink . People who don’t eat beef would raise voice to ban cow slaughter and who don’t drink would