Skip to main content

Reverse Migration – Stress in the rural economy

The CoVID19 pandemic has forced the shutdown of all economic activities all over the world. The pandemic has cost many lives and left lakhs of people affected. It also affected the global economy and left many people jobless. This situation has caused reverse migration in the domestic and global level. The Guest workers of India were returning to their home from foreign countries and urban cities of India where they had their livelihoods since the pandemic left them with no income.
Pic source: Economic Times

The situation of the guest workers is very worst since they don’t have much cash in their hands to survive the lockdown whether domestic or globally. The reason for their situation is ignorance of the govt in the first place. When there is a movement of labour from one place to another the two sides of the govt must have some data about the migration without affecting the liberty to free movement. The other important reasons were rumours, emotions of the labour and very importantly starving. The emotion and fear of an individual to reach their family comes when they hear rumours and there is no connectivity. Once the mobile phone balance gets empty there would have been no recharge shops opened and no cash with them even it is opened. That would have forced them to walk the long journey.

Pic Source: Economic Times

Why it’s the govt's mistake? The answer is a govt has handled it very efficiently. Kerala govt has named the migrant workers as guest workers and provided them with food and accommodation with direct cash for their essential needs like mobile recharge etc.[1] So the workers were aware of the situation and had connectivity to their families. This avoided them from reaching their home by walking. Rumours are also an important reason as the workers gathered in Maharashtra due to the rumour.[2]

The situation in rural areas

The reason for migration is the lack of development and ability to provide employment by the underdeveloped rural areas. So returning to the rural areas obviously lead to stress in the rural economy and unemployment. The only option in the rural areas is the farm work and it couldn’t include every individual in the area. Govt has announced additional ₹40,000 crores to the MGNREGS to provide income security to about 2 crore guest workers. Most of the guest workers belong to the states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, so the Union extended more assistance to those states compared to the southern states. But obviously, that wouldn’t be enough; it couldn’t solve the income and employment problem compared to the pre-pandemic situation.

There are no potential options to engage the guest workers in rural areas as they would return to the urban areas once the situation gets normal. Establishment of new businesses to engage them is also not possible since they lack capital and market. The reverse migration causes stress not only in the rural economy but also in society. The unemployment and lack of income force them to go for usury interests that would affect them badly. The situation leaves many of them starving. The landlords in the rural areas would exploit them for a low salary and lead them to the jobs that affect the dignity of the poor.

Does reverse migration cripple the rural economy?

The emotions, fear or affection on the family would have forced the guest labours to return to their hometown but poverty is more powerful. No emotions, fear, laws, pandemic, walls or fence can stop people from migrating to developed areas for better living, food and shelter from underdeveloped areas. Poverty is the driving force, only because of unemployment and lack of good salary guest labours have returned to Punjab fields last week[3] and guest labours of Odisha returned to TN[4] even during the pandemic. Once the transport is available they will rush back to work. Even if they stay for a short time they won’t be staying for a long time. Govt should somehow provide monetary assistance to the guest workers so that they don’t starve as the rural areas don’t have the potential to provide them with employment or food.

Increase in FDI, FPI will account for development in businesses and increase in employment but they employ skilled labours mostly. The guest workers belong to unskilled labour mostly working in construction sites, hotels, housekeeping etc. So, liquidity for those small businesses providing employment for guest workers should be ensured. A liberal policy in terms of taxes and speedy project clearances is needed. A responsible model for guest workers needs to be built. They should be provided with a good workplace, accommodation and fair remuneration.

References

  1. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/guest-workers-want-to-stay-back-kerala-tells-sc/article31760947.ece
  2. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/maharashtra-orders-probe-into-rumours-that-fuelled-migrants-rush-at-bandra/story-MZDkLeoiGJQrAB8delSOCK.html
  3. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/migrant-workers-return-to-punjabs-barnala-6446440/
  4. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/coronavirus-lockdown-low-wages-force-fishermen-of-odishas-ganjam-to-return-to-chennai/article31761205.ece

Comments

Popular Posts

சமூக நீதி - அரசியல் பிரதிநிதித்துவம்

சுயமரியாதை இயக்க பிரச்சாரமே சமூக மாற்றத்தை ஏற்படுத்த போதுமானது என்று பெரியார் நம்பிக்கொண்டிருந்தபோது ஆட்சி அதிகாரம் மூலமாகத்தான் சமூக மாற்றத்தை உண்டாக்க முடியும் என்று அண்ணா அரசியலில் இறங்கினார். சமூக மாற்றமே (social change) சமூக நீதியை (social equity/ justice) அடைய உதவும். நீதி கட்சி முதல் திராவிட கட்சிகள் வரையிலான சமூக நீதிக்கான பயணத்தில், கல்வி வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் இட ஒதுக்கீடு, வாழ்வாதார மேம்பாடு என பல திட்டங்கள் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு வெகுவாக சென்றடைந்தது. ஆனால் இவை ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கும் சென்றடைந்ததா, அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கை தரம் உயர்ந்ததா என்று பார்த்தால் பிற்படுத்தபட்ட மக்களுக்கு கிடைத்த நன்மைகள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டோருக்கு கடத்தப்படவில்லை என்பது தெளிவாக தெரியும். இதற்கு நிலவுடைமை, சமூக மூலதனம் (social capital, term introduced by CJI D Y Chandrachud) ஆகியவை முக்கிய காரணம். இதை பற்றி S நாராயன் IAS, வாஜ்பாய் ஆட்சியில் Finance  Secretary ஆக இருந்தவர் அவரின் புத்தகத்தில் (The Dravidian Years) குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார். இதன் மூலமாக கல்வி மற்றும் வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் கிடைக்கும் இட ஒதுக்கீடு மட்டும்

Protectionism

In a major setback for the Haryana government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Nov 17, 2023 struck down a state law mandating 75 per cent reservation for locals in private sector jobs, calling it "unconstitutional". While stating that private employers cannot be forced to employ persons from a particular state, the court, in its order, underlined that discriminating against individuals based on their state would be negative treatment against other citizens of the country. I have discussed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 in the perspective of problems due to protectionism in the article dated July 10, 2020. I have advocated that these kind of protectionist laws are irrational as it infringes fundamental rights of the citizens and rights and liberty of the corporates and private companies too. Im glad that the High court pronounced a judgement striking down the law as it is unconstitutional. Excerpts from Protectionism and Reverse migration, July

Liquor shops in India – Celebrated Glory or Shameful Dishonor?

Due to the nationwide lock-down from March 25, all the economic activities are shut down except for the essential services. Since liquor doesn’t come under essential needs liquor shops have also been closed. Though the pandemic situation is still in persistence, the government has allowed the shops to sell liquor. From then there are so many controversies and debates happening for and against the liquor ban. And the people are also agitating against the opening of liquor shops. So, here we will discuss, whether the country really needs a liquor ban or not, along with other associated aspects. Rights come first Though opening liquor shops during this severe pandemic situation is totally irrational and highly condemnable, I differ in the idea of a complete ban on liquor.  The state cannot interfere or coerce its ideologies to the citizens.  It is the right of people to choose their food or drink . People who don’t eat beef would raise voice to ban cow slaughter and who don’t drink would