Skip to main content

Protectionism and Reverse Migration

The H1B visa suspension by the US to have Rs 1200 crore impact on Indian IT firms, Crisil ratings said. The coronavirus pandemic has induced protectionism around the world encouraging domestic aspirations. The protectionism adversely affects the migrant labours abroad and in the country. In the globalization era, the protectionism against free movement of labour affects the labours and also leaves the employers to deprive of cheap labours.

Also read: Reverse Migration - Stress in the rural economy

Protectionism isn't the solution

The CoVID'19 has affected the economy and left many jobless but protectionism is definitely not a solution for the revival. The suspension of H1B visas has created a debate and a strong resistance among the tech employers in the US mainly those depended on Indian IT employees. However many experts argue that the visa ban won't help in increasing domestic employment. This kind of protectionism to increase domestic employment is done not only in the US but also in the Gulf, and to our surprise in India too. The world is moving towards liberalisation and globalisation that encourages free movement of labour and capital, working against the liberal spirit during the time of a crisis is not rational as humankind should fight the crisis together.

When the decision of protectionism is evaluated, the investors may tend to choose other destinations of cheap labour and taxes instead of places that encourage protectionism. This might affect the employment opportunities and the tax revenues of the country. During the period of economic slowdown, the huge low-interest loans should never be missed due to irrational decisions. 

The Haryana cabinet cleared a proposal to draft an ordinance for reserving 75% of private-sector jobs for the residents of the state. This move of the Haryana govt is totally irrational during the time of a crisis that has heavily hit the nation. The govt may implement their election manifesto and please the voters and supporters but what will be the situation of the migrant labours and employers those who depend on them. This is a regressive decision compared to the central govt's decision of promoting free markets in agriculture.

Reverse migration & crisis due to protectionism

The suspension of H1B visa by the US will affect the Indian IT companies and employees much than it would benefit the US employees and employers. Also, the suspension of M1 and L1 visas for students and professionals those who attend classes online and work from home is also cruel. This is going to badly affect the students studying in the US. The H1B visa suspension consoles us when we think of Kuwait's ex-pat quota bill that may force 8 lakh Indians to leave.

The skilled labours who were affected by the protectionism may get a job since India is attracting more foreign investments in the IT and other sectors. But the unskilled and semi-skilled labours worked in the Gulf countries might get very much affected. India is already undergoing a very hard time due to the reverse migration, people are not getting enough food or job to survive.

The reverse migration definitely created stress in the underdeveloped areas in India. In the previous article, I argued the reverse migration may not cripple the rural economy as the migrant labours started their journey back to the states where they usually work and that would happen even in the case of foreign countries. But to my shock, the countries came up with protective decisions to encourage domestic employment. 


Haryana govt's decision is irrational and cruel. The central govt is struggling to handle the migrant labours who migrated to their home states and migrating back. The people are suffering without getting proper income and food. There is no clarity on free rations for the returning migrants. The MGNREGS that comes as a saviour to the people has attained its saturation. About 1.5L households have completed their 100 days of work for the year and a 20L households will complete their working days in about one and a half months.  After the completion what will be their situation in a quite monsoon season with no agriculture jobs as sowing is already done? The Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan is also incapable of accommodating all the migrant workers and providing them with a considerable salary. 

With this stressful situation in the rural economy, people always tend to migrate to a better place in search of a good salary and living condition. But the protectionism stays as a barrier and affects the most underprivileged section of the society. The State should not restrict the free movement of labour and capital and ensure a liberal approach in economic decisions. The migrant workers should be monetized through direct benefits or increasing number of working days in MGNREGS etc.

Reference

  1. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/haryana-75-quota-private-jobs-6492986/?fbclid=IwAR28mM6Re4c34_a7V-7hBENNCwxOqPFgWvuEhZrdREBliRnIARYEn57d7LQ
  2. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/over-8-lakh-indians-may-be-forced-to-leave-as-kuwait-approves-expat-quota-bill-6492287/
  3. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/visa-and-immigration/who-all-will-be-hurt-the-most-by-trumps-visa-ban/articleshow/76683369.cms
  4. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/rolling-back-the-induced-livelihood-shock/article32006795.ece?fbclid=IwAR15EHBkLWbJ4Dhj8tWDdGMvK-jcrmdILZHSFdz4lVxa32MbIBie353wgcs
  5. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/school-shut-no-mid-day-meal-children-in-bihar-village-back-to-work-selling-scrap-6491830/?fbclid=IwAR0WbUsK5CKiJf0Y29JZa0HoOqifL9Fw9mtfO4M8JwrWBwISJgfuLEMQBmQ
  6. https://progressiverationalist.blogspot.com/2020/06/garib-kalyan-rojgar-abhiyan-reverse.html

Comments

Popular Posts

சமூக நீதி - அரசியல் பிரதிநிதித்துவம்

சுயமரியாதை இயக்க பிரச்சாரமே சமூக மாற்றத்தை ஏற்படுத்த போதுமானது என்று பெரியார் நம்பிக்கொண்டிருந்தபோது ஆட்சி அதிகாரம் மூலமாகத்தான் சமூக மாற்றத்தை உண்டாக்க முடியும் என்று அண்ணா அரசியலில் இறங்கினார். சமூக மாற்றமே (social change) சமூக நீதியை (social equity/ justice) அடைய உதவும். நீதி கட்சி முதல் திராவிட கட்சிகள் வரையிலான சமூக நீதிக்கான பயணத்தில், கல்வி வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் இட ஒதுக்கீடு, வாழ்வாதார மேம்பாடு என பல திட்டங்கள் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு வெகுவாக சென்றடைந்தது. ஆனால் இவை ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கும் சென்றடைந்ததா, அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கை தரம் உயர்ந்ததா என்று பார்த்தால் பிற்படுத்தபட்ட மக்களுக்கு கிடைத்த நன்மைகள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டோருக்கு கடத்தப்படவில்லை என்பது தெளிவாக தெரியும். இதற்கு நிலவுடைமை, சமூக மூலதனம் (social capital, term introduced by CJI D Y Chandrachud) ஆகியவை முக்கிய காரணம். இதை பற்றி S நாராயன் IAS, வாஜ்பாய் ஆட்சியில் Finance  Secretary ஆக இருந்தவர் அவரின் புத்தகத்தில் (The Dravidian Years) குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார். இதன் மூலமாக கல்வி மற்றும் வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் கிடைக்கும் இட ஒதுக்கீடு மட்டும்

Protectionism

In a major setback for the Haryana government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Nov 17, 2023 struck down a state law mandating 75 per cent reservation for locals in private sector jobs, calling it "unconstitutional". While stating that private employers cannot be forced to employ persons from a particular state, the court, in its order, underlined that discriminating against individuals based on their state would be negative treatment against other citizens of the country. I have discussed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 in the perspective of problems due to protectionism in the article dated July 10, 2020. I have advocated that these kind of protectionist laws are irrational as it infringes fundamental rights of the citizens and rights and liberty of the corporates and private companies too. Im glad that the High court pronounced a judgement striking down the law as it is unconstitutional. Excerpts from Protectionism and Reverse migration, July

Liquor shops in India – Celebrated Glory or Shameful Dishonor?

Due to the nationwide lock-down from March 25, all the economic activities are shut down except for the essential services. Since liquor doesn’t come under essential needs liquor shops have also been closed. Though the pandemic situation is still in persistence, the government has allowed the shops to sell liquor. From then there are so many controversies and debates happening for and against the liquor ban. And the people are also agitating against the opening of liquor shops. So, here we will discuss, whether the country really needs a liquor ban or not, along with other associated aspects. Rights come first Though opening liquor shops during this severe pandemic situation is totally irrational and highly condemnable, I differ in the idea of a complete ban on liquor.  The state cannot interfere or coerce its ideologies to the citizens.  It is the right of people to choose their food or drink . People who don’t eat beef would raise voice to ban cow slaughter and who don’t drink would