Skip to main content

Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan & Reverse migration

Govt. has come up with Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan (Poor Welfare Employment Scheme) to provide employment in rural areas and reduce the financial stress created due to the nationwide lockdown. The scheme is a merger of 25 govt schemes including housing scheme, providing drinking water through taps, road construction etc. and govt has planned to implement it in 116 districts across 6 states (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh). The CG has fixed 125 days target to implement the scheme and a total of 6.7 million guest workers to be provided works in house construction, rural infrastructure development, Anganwadi construction etc (that are a part of 25 govt schemes merged in GKRA) according to their skillset.


The Garib Kalyan Rojgar Abhiyan is a part of the relief package of 20 Lakh crores announced by the govt last month. The budget of the scheme is 50,000 crores and FM announced on June 18,2020 that the funds will be drawn from the 61,500 crores sanctioned in the Feb Budget 20-21 for providing rural employment. The govt also announced a separate 40,000 crores to provide rural employment but that is not included in it. Since this is a 125-day campaign announced by the govt about 2/3rd of total guest workers would be highly benefitted by the scheme until they return to work in other states. 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on June 20 launched the GKRA through video conferencing. The scheme is highly welcome since its 125-day campaign provides job opportunities for the guest workers and monetise the poor in this period of the economic slowdown. This would avoid the poor from going for usury interest and being exploited by the landlords

As mentioned in the previous article Reverse migration - stress in the rural economy, the dignity of the poor would be affected by exploitative jobs and their self-respect would be affected as they go for usury borrowings if there weren't any monetising schemes offered by govt. The govt's GKRA initiative is highly commendable as it provides income support to the guest workers and the opportunity to improve their rural infrastructure.

The centre understands the self-respect of a rural worker, we will make sure that no one in villages need to depend on borrowings during this period. - PM Narendra Modi 

Even though it is implemented only in 6 states it covers almost 2/3rd of the migrant workers in rural areas. Also, there are another 40,000 crores sanctioned yet to be used. So, govt may extend the same to other states or it might use that fund for a new scheme that provides job opportunities and income support in rural areas. But this scheme is a 125-day campaign, the guest workers will be engaged in this scheme and this would affect the businesses depending on the guest workers in the states where they worked before. And those businesses will need to deploy new labours and local labours might ask more wages, this would consecutively result in more price of the service or product. 

Particularly in the construction business where the client pays before the building is handed over and the contract will be closed. If the building's price increases due to increased wages that would adversely affect the builder. Govt providing good local income opportunities is welcome but free movement of labour and capital would boost economic growth. And since it is a 125-day campaign we could expect after that the workers will return to the states where they were working previously.

References

  1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/pm-narendra-modi-launches-garib-kalyan-rojgar-abhiyaan-key-points/articleshow/76477176.cms
  2. https://progressiverationalist.blogspot.com/2020/06/reverse-migration-stress-in-rural.html

Comments

Popular Posts

சமூக நீதி - அரசியல் பிரதிநிதித்துவம்

சுயமரியாதை இயக்க பிரச்சாரமே சமூக மாற்றத்தை ஏற்படுத்த போதுமானது என்று பெரியார் நம்பிக்கொண்டிருந்தபோது ஆட்சி அதிகாரம் மூலமாகத்தான் சமூக மாற்றத்தை உண்டாக்க முடியும் என்று அண்ணா அரசியலில் இறங்கினார். சமூக மாற்றமே (social change) சமூக நீதியை (social equity/ justice) அடைய உதவும். நீதி கட்சி முதல் திராவிட கட்சிகள் வரையிலான சமூக நீதிக்கான பயணத்தில், கல்வி வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் இட ஒதுக்கீடு, வாழ்வாதார மேம்பாடு என பல திட்டங்கள் பிற்படுத்தப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு வெகுவாக சென்றடைந்தது. ஆனால் இவை ஒடுக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கும் சென்றடைந்ததா, அவர்களின் வாழ்க்கை தரம் உயர்ந்ததா என்று பார்த்தால் பிற்படுத்தபட்ட மக்களுக்கு கிடைத்த நன்மைகள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டோருக்கு கடத்தப்படவில்லை என்பது தெளிவாக தெரியும். இதற்கு நிலவுடைமை, சமூக மூலதனம் (social capital, term introduced by CJI D Y Chandrachud) ஆகியவை முக்கிய காரணம். இதை பற்றி S நாராயன் IAS, வாஜ்பாய் ஆட்சியில் Finance  Secretary ஆக இருந்தவர் அவரின் புத்தகத்தில் (The Dravidian Years) குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார். இதன் மூலமாக கல்வி மற்றும் வேலை வாய்ப்புகளில் கிடைக்கும் இட ஒதுக்கீடு மட்டும்

Protectionism

In a major setback for the Haryana government, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Nov 17, 2023 struck down a state law mandating 75 per cent reservation for locals in private sector jobs, calling it "unconstitutional". While stating that private employers cannot be forced to employ persons from a particular state, the court, in its order, underlined that discriminating against individuals based on their state would be negative treatment against other citizens of the country. I have discussed the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 in the perspective of problems due to protectionism in the article dated July 10, 2020. I have advocated that these kind of protectionist laws are irrational as it infringes fundamental rights of the citizens and rights and liberty of the corporates and private companies too. Im glad that the High court pronounced a judgement striking down the law as it is unconstitutional. Excerpts from Protectionism and Reverse migration, July

Liquor shops in India – Celebrated Glory or Shameful Dishonor?

Due to the nationwide lock-down from March 25, all the economic activities are shut down except for the essential services. Since liquor doesn’t come under essential needs liquor shops have also been closed. Though the pandemic situation is still in persistence, the government has allowed the shops to sell liquor. From then there are so many controversies and debates happening for and against the liquor ban. And the people are also agitating against the opening of liquor shops. So, here we will discuss, whether the country really needs a liquor ban or not, along with other associated aspects. Rights come first Though opening liquor shops during this severe pandemic situation is totally irrational and highly condemnable, I differ in the idea of a complete ban on liquor.  The state cannot interfere or coerce its ideologies to the citizens.  It is the right of people to choose their food or drink . People who don’t eat beef would raise voice to ban cow slaughter and who don’t drink would